* Astronomy

Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: ATLAS17aeu


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
ATLAS17aeu
Permalink  
 


Title: Observations of the GRB afterglow ATLAS17aeu and its possible association with GW170104
Author: B. Stalder, J. Tonry, S. J. Smartt, M. Coughlin, K. C. Chambers, C. W. Stubbs, T.-W. Chen, E. Kankare, K. W. Smith, L. Denneau, A. Sherstyuk, A. Heinze, H. Weiland, A. Rest, D. R. Young, M. E. Huber, H. Flewelling, T. Lowe, E. A. Magnier, A. S. B. Schultz, C. Waters, R. Wainscoat, M. Willman, D. E. Wright, J. Chu, D. Sanders, C. Inserra, K. Maguire, R. Kotak

We report the discovery and multi-wavelength data analysis of the peculiar optical transient, ATLAS17aeu. This transient was identified in the skymap of the LIGO gravitational wave event GW170104 by our ATLAS and Pan-STARRS coverage. ATLAS17aeu was discovered 23.1hrs after GW170104 and rapidly faded over the next 3 nights, with a spectrum revealing a blue featureless continuum. The transient was also detected as a fading x-ray source by Swift and in the radio at 6 and 15 GHz. A gamma ray burst GRB170105 was detected by 3 satellites 19.04 hrs after GW170104 and 4.10 hrs before our first optical detection. We analyse the multi-wavelength fluxes in the context of the known GRB population and discuss the observed sky rates of GRBs and their afterglows. We find it statistically likely that ATLAS17aeu is an afterglow associated with GRB170105, with a chance coincidence ruled out at the 99% confidence or 2.6 sigma. A long, soft GRB within a redshift range of 1 \lesssim z \lesssim 2.9 would be consistent with all the observed multi-wavelength data. The Poisson probability of a chance occurrence of GW170104 and ATLAS17aeu is p=0.04. This is the probability of a chance coincidence in 2D sky location and in time. These observations indicate that ATLAS17aeu is plausibly a normal GRB afterglow at significantly higher redshift than the distance constraint for GW170104 and therefore a chance coincidence. However if a redshift of the faint host were to place it within the GW170104 distance range, then physical association with GW170104 should be considered.


Read more (8932kb, PDF)



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard