* Astronomy

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info
TOPIC: Stonehenge


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
RE: Stonehenge
Permalink  
 


A missing stone which could be an integral part of rituals at Stonehenge may have been discovered by a Welsh archaeologist.
Dennis Price, who has done years of research on the mysterious stone structure, believes he has tracked down a previously lost altar stone, identified during one of the first studies of the site in the 17th century. He is convinced it is now in two pieces on either side of a road in a Wiltshire village, just a couple of miles from Stonehenge itself.
 Mr Price has studied the archaeology of Stonehenge for years, and in 2003 filmed the excavation of the graves of the Welsh Boscombe Bowmen who helped build Stonehenge. He believes the stones found used to be the altar stone which was named and described by 17th century architect Inigo Jones. Jones, one of his era's most prominent architects, was the first person known to have carried out detailed measurements of Stonehenge in 1620.
The stones are made of Jurassic limestone - found in Dorset and the Cotswolds, but not locally. And the stones, if put together, would look remarkably similar to one in a Victorian woodcut picture he has acquired. Price believes the stone was taken from the site in the Victorian era, when such raids were commonplace.

"We have a woodcut of an easily carved stone with a distinctive shape being cut in two at Stonehenge, and we have accounts of a curious altar stone as described by Inigo Jones being transported to somewhere called St James. We have drawn a blank at the Palace of St James, but when we look at the nearby village of Berwick St James, we find two standing stones that once formed two bridges across a stream, and if we mentally reunite the parts, they bear an uncanny resemblance to the stone in the woodcut. On the balance of probabilities, there can be little doubt that Inigo Jones's fabled and once-lost altar stone from Stonehenge now stands in two pieces in a nearby village either side of a small lane, in plain view of anyone who wishes to inspect them."

Dr Julie Gardiner from Wessex Archaeology, a leading authority on Stonehenge, said many stones had been taken from the site.

"Lots have been broken up and taken away, especially by the Victorians" - Dr Julie Gardiner

 She added one 'altar stone' was already accounted for, but admitted there could be more.

"There is a stone called the altar stone, which is still at the site. It's under a larger stone and would have been knocked over when it fell. But a lot of stones have been removed, and may have been given any number of names" - Dr Julie Gardiner

Source: icWales

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Avebury skeleton
Permalink  
 


Druids are demanding the re-burial of a child's skeleton displayed in the stone circle museum in Avebury.
On Tuesday the Council of British Druids backed up their request with a small ceremony at the Alexander Keiller Museum.
The child's skeleton was discovered during excavations at the North Ditch at Windmill Hill in 1929. Dubbed Charlie or Charlotte, is one of the most popular exhibits in the museum.
Now the Order of Druids, the group that celebrates mother earth and holds solstice ceremonies at Avebury, wants the skeleton reinterred.

Read more

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Durrington Walls
Permalink  
 


The location of the dig site at which archaeologists discovered the ancient settlement is at Durrington Walls. It is located approximately 1.8 miles East-North-East of StoneHenge. Experts say it is likely that the dwellers of this place transported their dead via the River Avon to StoneHenge, which may have been used as a funeral site.

durrington Walls
Expand (156kb, 800 x 600)

Latitude: 51°11'30.65"N Longitude: 1°47'7.65"W

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Permalink  
 

Archaeologists say they have found a huge ancient settlement used by the people who built Stonehenge.
Excavations at Durrington Walls, near the legendary Salisbury Plain monument, uncovered remains of ancient houses.
The dwellings date back to 2,600-2,500 BC, the same period that Stonehenge was built.
In ancient times, this settlement housed hundreds of people, making it the largest Neolithic village ever found in Britain.

Read more

Attachments
__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
RE: Stonehenge
Permalink  
 


Recent excavations of Salisbury Plain in southern England have revealed at least two other large stone formations close by the world-famous prehistoric monument. One of the megalithic finds is a sandstone formation that marked a ritual burial mound; the other, a group of stones at the site of an ancient timber circle.
The new discoveries suggest that many similar monuments may have been erected in the shadow of Stonehenge, possibly forming part of a much larger complex.
The findings were part of the Stonehenge Riverside Project, a joint initiative to explore the land around the iconic monument. Led by Mike Parker Pearson of Sheffield University, the project involves six English universities.
The first monument—a 2.8-meter-long sarsen stone—was found lying in a field next to the River Avon, 3.2 kilometres east of Stonehenge, which is located near the modern-day city of Salisbury. The riverside sarsen—large sandstone blocks that occur naturally in southern England—had been stood upright, like the blocks that form the main structure of Stonehenge.
A team lead by Colin Richards of Manchester University and Joshua Pollard of Bristol University found the hole that originally held the stone, dug between 2500 and 2000 BCE, as well as human remains and artefacts that date to the same period.
The partially cremated remains of two people were buried next to the stone. One was a large male whose unburned vertebrae suggest he was at least 182 centimetres tall.

"Seemingly he was so big they weren't able to cremate him properly. The unburnt bone is the product of that poor process of cremation" - Joshua Pollard.

Stone knives and arrowheads, a piece of limestone carved into the shape of a megalith, two pottery bowls, and a rare rock crystal were also unearthed near the burial site. The rock crystal find is the earliest known example from Britain and possibly came from as far away as the Alps.
Archaeologists have suggested that other prehistoric burials in the area were connected to mainland Europe. Such a connection ties in with theories that Stonehenge was an important pilgrimage destination or a place where people travelled in the hope of miracle cures. The megalithic burial site could also support theories that link Stonehenge and other standing stones to ancestor worship and commemorating the dead.
Pollard's team also found new evidence for stone settings at Woodhenge, a site 2 kilometres northeast of Stonehenge where a timber circle was constructed in about 2200 BCE. Excavations in the 1920s hinted a stone monument may once have been present at the site.

"We were able to confirm last summer that there had been standing stones — some very considerable stones — at Woodhenge" - Joshua Pollard.

While only fragments of the formation were found, the holes the stones were set in suggest the blocks stood up to 3 meters  tall. The team also found evidence for two phases of stone settings that probably came after the timber circle had rotted.

"Four smaller stones were replaced by two much bigger sarsen settings. So it goes from a timber monument to being a megalithic monument, albeit not on the same scale as Stonehenge" - Joshua Pollard.

 What happened to the stones at Woodhenge remains a mystery, though one possibility is that they were added to Stonehenge.
The research team says there is evidence from old maps and ancient sources for other similar monuments near Stonehenge.

"There may have been many smaller megalithic settings across this landscape. I think it's extremely likely there would have been other standing stones" - Joshua Pollard.

"Particularly to the east" -  Julian Thomas, professor of archaeology at Manchester University.

Such monuments would have had an important connection to Stonehenge. The stones and artefacts buried alongside the satellite monuments may have also played a symbolic role in spreading the authority of Stonehenge into the wider landscape.

Source: National Geographic News

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Stonehenge Aotearoa
Permalink  
 


For millennia people have gazed in awe at Stonehenge and other great stone circles, often totally unaware of how these structures were used. Now a full-scale working adaptation of Stonehenge has been built right here in Aotearoa, allowing all New Zealanders to experience the wonders of stone circles for themselves. Situated in the Wairarapa countryside, a short distance from Wellington, Stonehenge Aotearoa is a window into the past where the visitor can rediscover the knowledge of their ancestors.
It incorporates ancient Egyptian, Babylonian and Celtic astronomy, Polynesian navigation, and Maori starlore.

Stonehenge Aotearoa is located on private property and is not open to casual visitors.

Read more

Stonehenge Aotearoa
Expand (100kb, 800 x 600)

Latitude -41.099446° Longitude 175.578056°

The original derivation of Aotearoa is not known for certain. Ao = cloud, tea = white and roa = long, and it is accordingly most often translated as "The land of the long white cloud".
But, Interestingly, the name 'Aotearoa', which is taken by many to be the Maori name for New Zealand, may have actually been invented by the poet William Pember Reeves.

-- Edited by Blobrana at 13:54, 2007-01-01

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Stonehenge
Permalink  
 


They got the date wrong by some 3,000 years, but the oldest detailed drawing of Stonehenge, apparently based on first hand observation, has turned up in a 15th century manuscript.

The little sketch is a bird's eye view of the stones, and shows the great trilithons, the biggest stones in the monument, each made of two pillars capped with a third stone lintel, which stand in a horseshoe in the centre of the circle. Only three are now standing, but the drawing, found in Douai, northern France, suggests that in the 15th century four of the original five survived.
In the Scala Mundi, the Chronicle of the World, Merlin is given credit for building Stonehenge between 480 and 486, when the Latin text says he "not by force, but by art, brought and erected the giant's ring from Ireland". Modern science suggests that the stones went up from 2,500 BC, with the bluestone outer circle somehow transported from west Wales, and the double decker bus-size sarsen stones dragged 30 miles across Salisbury plain.

Read more

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Permalink  
 

Professor Timothy Darvill, Head of the Archaeology Group at Bournemouth University, has breathed new life into the controversy surrounding the origins of Stonehenge by publishing a theory which suggests that the ancient monument was a source and centre for healing and not a place for the dead as believed by many previous scholars.

Read more

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Permalink  
 

Stonehenge was a place of healing and not a place for the dead, according to a scholar who attributes its powers to its Welsh origins.
Professor Timothy Darvill shed new light yesterday on the purpose of the ancient stone circles of Stonehenge.
The academic says the basis for his findings is found in the Preseli Mountains in West Wales, where he and colleague Professor Geoffrey Wainwright have found bluestones used in the construction of Stonehenge's stone circles 155 miles away.
Stonehenge was erected between 3000BC and 1600BC. There has always been intense debate over the reason it was built, with theories ranging from human sacrifice to astronomy.
But Prof Darvill believes the thousands of solstice revellers who visit the monuments on the longest day of each year to mark the arrival of summer are celebrating in error.

Read more

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
RE: Happy solstice everyone!
Permalink  
 


Tourists should visit ancient stone circles in Scotland rather than Stonehenge, it has been claimed.
The National Geographic Traveller describes world famous Stonehenge in Wiltshire, which is estimated to date back to 3100BC, as "crowded and noisy".
And experts from the leading US magazine suggest tourists would be better visiting ancient stone sites such as Callanish on the Isle of Lewis and the Nether Largie Cairns in Kilmartin Glen, Argyll.

They say of Stonehenge: "What a mess. Compelling, over-loved, the current experience lacks magic. It would be good if something is done to the surrounding landscape. Good interpretation and so impressive. But you can get a similar impact from lots of other stone circles, especially up north in Scotland, without all the noise and intrusion."

The Twelve Apostles in Dumfries, Croft Moraig in Kenmore, Tayside, Stones of Stenness in Orkney and the Auld Wife in Shetland are among the other Scots sites.
The Stonehenge criticism came after a survey of 94 World Heritage sites by National Geographic Traveller.

Source Daily Record

__________________
«First  <  18 9 10 11 12 13  >  Last»  | Page of 13  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard