* Astronomy

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: T-Lyr1-17236


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
RE: T-Lyr1-17236
Permalink  
 


T-Lyr1-17236: A Long-Period Low-Mass Eclipsing Binary.

USNO-B 1366-0314305
Primary and secondary component masses, MA = 0.6795 ± 0.0107 solar masses and MB = 0.5226 ± 0.0061 solar masses.
Spectral types: K5V and M0V
Orbital period: 8.4-day
V magnitude: 14.37 ± 0.28
Distance:  230±20 pc

T-Lyr1-17236

Google Sky file (1kb, kmz)

Position(2000): RA 19:07:16.621, Dec +46:39:53.21

__________________


L

Posts: 131433
Date:
Permalink  
 

Title: T-Lyr1-17236: A Long-Period Low-Mass Eclipsing Binary
Authors: Jonathan Devor, David Charbonneau, Guillermo Torres, Cullen H. Blake, Russel J. White, Markus Rabus, Francis T. O'Donovan, Georgi Mandushev, Gaspar Bakos, Gabor Furesz, Andrew Szentgyorgyi

We describe the discovery of a 0.68+0.52 solar mass eclipsing binary (EB) with an 8.4-day orbital period, found through a systematic search of ten fields of the Trans-atlantic Exoplanet Survey (TrES). Such long-period low-mass EBs constitute critical test cases for resolving the long standing discrepancy between the theoretical and observational mass-radius relations at the bottom of the main sequence. It has been suggested that this discrepancy may be related to strong stellar magnetic fields, which are not properly accounted for in current theoretical models. All previously well-characterised low-mass main sequence EBs have periods of a few days or less, and their components are therefore expected to be rotating rapidly as a result of tidal synchronisation, thus generating strong magnetic fields. In contrast, the binary system described here has a period that is over three times longer than previously characterised low-mass main sequence EBs, and its components rotate relatively slowly. It is therefore expected to have a weaker magnetic field and to better match the assumptions of theoretical stellar models. Our follow-up observations of this EB yield preliminary stellar properties that suggest it is indeed consistent with current models. If further observations confirm a low level of activity in this system, these determinations would provide support for the hypothesis that the mass-radius discrepancy is at least partly due to magnetic activity.

Read more (299kb, PDF)

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard